The Josef Stalin
Vote Fraud Page

"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything."

—Communist Tyrant and mass murderer Josef Stalin
 (attributed)

Stalin's quote (or variations thereof) has become surprisingly popular since it first appeared on Citizens for a Fair Vote Count's former website in 1996. We assembled numerous links that examine the question of the quote's  authenticity,  the use of it in different contexts (it's been invoked by individuals with views as diverse as Rush Limbaugh and Alan Dershowitz!) and we even found some Stalin era election poster art, including one that shows the dictator casting a ballot.  While a primary source for the quote has yet to be uncovered, there is no question that a truth is contained therein. For more, go to The Josef Stalin Vote Fraud Page.

 

votefraud 101--ESSENTIAL READING

If you are new to the "computer vote fraud vs. honest elections" issue, you can become an "expert" by examining the links in this section

Archive of "Must Read" Articles
(This is here so you notice it -- and contains an avalanche of information -- but we recommend you skip the archives until you read the key articles in this blue box.)

New To THIS SUBJECT? Click here for a Quick Guide

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

If you watch the YouTube Video immediately below, -- and then read the next 13 articles listed -- you will be an expert on this subject.

SOUTH CAROLINA, SUPER TUESDAY, AND RON PAUL  - YouTube Video
(See "10 Minute College Course" video on the state of our "elections" -- 30 years of research served up to you in ten entertaining minutes: Go to this youtube video made during the 2008 Presidential Primaries)
 

Votescam Overview 2007 (still Holds in 2010) - Find out what the Other websites will not touch 
(Updated August 15, 2007 -- still holds in 2010) What actually happened on Election Night, 2000, 2004, and all the other election nights since at least as far back as 1988. The mechanism by which 4 private companies have been delegated the power to nullify the voters' choice, and substitute their own. 

 Eye witness report from election night 2004!  
How a Private company Counts our Votes on Election night (Eyewitness report from Cook County, Illinois)
by Christopher Bollyn (more from Christopher at bollyn.com)

A HOUSE WITHOUT DOORS by Jim Condit Jr.
PUBLISHED IN  THE PRESTIGIOUS CHRONICLES MAGAZINE
Explanation of Proven Votefraud in the 1996 GOP Iowa Caucus against Presidential Candidate Pat Buchanan and the people of Dubuque, Iowa -- perpetrated by ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and AP wire -- through the corporation they jointly own: the disgraced Voter News Service, now renamed National Election Pool. (FOX Cable News was not a factor in 1996, but FOX joined the Computer Votefraud Syndicate cabal by 1998.) Prove to yourself that all the Big TV Networks and AP wire owns National Election Pool (formally Voter News Service) by clicking on NEP's website here.
 

PANDORA'S BLACK BOX: DID IT REALLY COUNT YOUR VOTE?
by Dr. Phil O'Halloran
Editor of Relevance Magazine
This is one of the most important pieces written in the modern computer vote counting age. O'Halloran is one of the most talented investigators in our day, and when he tackled this subject he wrote a "must read" for everyone interested in this issue. This is good synopsis of the state of the problem in November, 1996 -- and prophetically identifies the ultimate issues in this arena which now threatens the future of the USA and the world. This article is 16 pages. (This article, plus "A HOUSE WITHOUT DOORS" immediately above, plus "VOTESCAM OVERVIEW 2007" at the top of this box -- gives you all you need to know to discuss this issue with anyone.)
 

HOW THEY COULD STEAL THE ELECTION THIS TIME
by Ronnie Dugger 2004
(This article appeared in The Nation right before the 2004 election; just reading the first few paragraphs will give you the gist of what's going on -- 4 sinister mega-companies -- Diebold, Hart, Sequoia, and Election Systems and Software, or ES & S,  have been delegated the power to "count" 96% of the votes in the USA. The local Democratic/Republican controlled Boards of Elections have stepped aside; so at least as far back as 1988 we have illegal secretly counted "elections" in the USA.)

What is the MOTIVE behind computerized votefraud?
Aren't the Democrats watching the Republicans, and the Republicans watching the Democrats, -- and isn't the news media watching them both? The answer is: NO! There is a larger force, -- a force which effectively controls the Republican and Democratic Parties, the 4 big Computer Vote "Counting" companies (ES & S, Diebold, Hart, Sequoia), and which completely controls the 5 Big TV Networks (ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX).
 

THE SOLUTION

The Answer: How our Votes Should be counted each election

the Action Solution!

WHAT CITIZENS (YOU) CAN DO AT THE POLLS
by Dan Gutenkauf
(This important article talks about three Supreme Court cases [Reynolds v Sim, 1915; US v Mosley, 1964; Wesberry v Sanders, 1964] which state that our right to vote consists of TWO parts: the right to CAST a vote AND the right to know that our vote was counted accurately. Secret Computer "vote counts" on secret software destroys the second part of our right to vote. Wesberry v Sanders further states that if the right to vote is undermined, all other rights are illusory.)

The Law is On Our Side
The Gutenkauf Research

THE GREATEST COVER-UP OF ALL: VOTEFRAUD IN AMERICA
by Jim Condit Jr.

SEE ASTOUNDING PICTURE PROVING BIG TV NETWORK HOAX

The "Competition" feigned by the Big TV Networks to Project "Winners" and "Losers" on Election Night has always been a HOAX -- and ABC, CBS, NBC, AP wire, (1975 to 2007) CNN (1992 to 2007) and FOX (1998 to 2007) -- KNEW it was a hoax all along. They were basing their "winner" and "loser" projections on alleged results from election day exit polls conducted by the sinister Voter News Service (VNS), a company which the Big TV Networks and AP jointly own. Far from engaging in any competition, the Big TV Networks were getting the exact same information, at the exact same time, from a company they had jointly created, and jointly owned. Keen observers noticed that the TV Networks never bragged at later times when they were first to project the winners on camera. Reason: the competition was a show -- the real purpose of the alleged exit poll information was to prepare the public mind for the rigged computer result about to be announced a few hours later. The exit Polls themselves have always been completely fraudulent. The exit pollers miss the rush hours of voting in the AM and PM. They start at 10 AM and quite at 5 PM. Citizens for a Fair Vote Count videotaped a real exit poll in New Hampshire during the 1996 Republican Primary which was won by Patrick Buchanan. The woman taking the exit poll for VNS is pictured at the link above, and she told us that only 1 out of 15 people would talk to the exit poller. Now, if you miss the rush hours of voting, if only 1 out of 15 voters will talk to the exit poller, if there are so few exit polls in the United States that you can hardly find anybody who's ever seen one -- then where is any possible scientific basis for these things? There is none, and they are a hoax perpetrated by the 5 Big TV Networks and their creature Voter News Service (now renamed National Election Pool) to psychologically war against the America people by perpetuating the acceptance of easily rigged computerized vote "counting" by a few private companies who are fixing all key elections for the Ruling Elite. See Picture and explanation by clicking on link above.
 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Understanding the REAL 2000 "Election" Scam
Democrats accused Republicans of stealing the election, while Republicans questioned whether Democrats could read a simple ballot, but behind the 2000 presidential election meltdown was a brilliant plan contrived to bring about radical changes in the way votes are counted--changes at the heart of the current touch-screen controversy.

FIRST EVER!  Affidavit from a Board of elections official exposing how Private companies are given the kind of access needed to fix USA elections
This affidavit was one of several given to a Congressman's office during hearings in Columbus, Ohio on December 13, 2004. The main affidavit comes from Sherelle Eaton, the Deputy Director of the Hocking County, Ohio Board of Elections.

reporter Lynn Landes confronts and Tears the mask off of Nationally Famous Groups and individuals holding themselves forth as Protecting Voters' rights
This is the kind of polite, personal, confrontational reporting that needs to happen all over the nation from now until honest elections are restored. This December 7, 2004 conference was sponsored in Washington D.C. by predominantly liberal/left wing groups. The same type of expose could be done about nationally famous "conservative" groups such as the NRA, Christian Coalition, National Right to Life, the Heritage Foundation, as well as "conservative" individuals such as Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, and Bill Bennett -- all of whom seem to have a precipitous IQ drop whenever this issue is intelligently discussed. Find other excellent writings by Lynn Landes at www.theLandesReport.com

 Shocking!  The Big fix 2004
by Daniel Hopsicker
Executives and owners of the two largest private "vote counting" companies, ES &S and Sequoia, have been convicted of bribery and suborning public officials in more than a dozen states. These two companies were delegated the power to count 60%+ of the USA vote in secret in Presidential Election 2004.

Network America Archives - E-wires by Date
January 10, 2000 to June 30, 2000
 

 End of this "Votefraud 101: Essential Reading" Section
 

Spotlighted Websites
 

The following individuals have the Citizens for a Fair Vote Count "seal of approval" for keeping their eye on the ball on how to restore machine-free, honest elections:

Lynn Landes, investigative reporter, "gets it." Her website is a reliable source of breaking news and really insightful analysis:
http://www.ecotalk.org/VotingSecurity.htm

Victoria Collier is "no compromise" when it comes to paper ballots and computer-free elections. She carries on for the late Collier Brothers, authors articles and conducts interviews, and still makes available: Votescam: The Stealing of America by Jim and Kenneth Collier. Go to:
www.votescam.com

Dan Gutenkauf addressed our 2000 Citizens for a Fair Vote Count Convention about how the law was on the side of machine free, open, verifiable elections. Some of his work can be found on this website: http://www.votefraud.org/gutenkauf_page.htm

Devvy Kidd who runs www.devvy.com -- one of her excellent articles on votefraud, in which she quotes one of our 1996 Cincinnatus Newsletters (which are not yet on this website) can be found at http://www.devvy.com/200411260736.html

 More INTELLIGENTLY WRITTEN ARTICLES

We offer the following links for more in depth research, but we do not endorse everything offered by them; the "Rule of Faith" for understanding how to restore honest elections in the USA and in the world is explained in our "Votefraud 101: Essential Reading" section (at the top of this blue box):

ELECTION FORENSICS: WHAT THEY CAN--AND CAN'T--TELL US
"There's one story about this election that we'll never know: what happened inside the machines that do not have a paper trail. It's somewhat reassuring that, in most instances at least, final exit polls and other external systems give us roughly the same picture that the election results do. But suppose that wasn't the case? This is what audit trails are for.¼"
 

2004 US ELECTION CONTROVERSIES AND IRREGULARITIES
(This page was mirrored on Nov. 16th because of a "Listed for Deletion" notice on the original website, where newer versions may be available.) 
 

Evidence of Electoral Fraud in the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election: A Reading List
 

How to hack the Vote
 

VNS Revisited: Beware of false "solutions" to the touch-screen voting dilemma
Note: VNS (Voter News Service) became NEP (National Election Pool) in 2004

Contrary to the claims of "opposition" groups such as Move On, Paper ballots won't cure electronic voting ills. At first glance, the call for independent monitoring of the machines (e.g., Democrats want voting machines audited) seems to solve the problem, but does it really? Not if the those doing the auditing turn out to be no more "independent" than the now-defunct Voter News Service (VNS) was. If the monitors are chosen by the joint leadership of the Democratic and Republican Parties, then third parties,  Independents and other non-partisan voices will be kept out of the process. If the Republicrats at the top decide that the Big Five TV Networks (ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox and NBC) are the "outsiders" they'll use for their "independent" auditing, then we'll be back exactly where we were when the Big Five together owned the VNS!