FROM THE Citizens for a Fair Vote Count ARCHIVES:

  From "Help Break the Cover-Up" -- a special edition newspaper produced by Citizens for a Fair Vote Count for the 1996 GOP Convention in San Diego.

July - November, 1996
From Page 1


Paper Ballots = Buchanan Wins

Computer States meant Dole "Landslides"

by Doug & Jinnie Voorhees, Mooresville, Indiana

Where neighbors met in caucuses for the 1996 GOP Presidential Primaries, or where paper ballots were hand-counted in the precincts, Patrick Buchanan did well, or won.

Where computers "counted" the votes, Buchanan always "lost" badly. After Arizona, Dole "won" every contest in overwhelming "landslides", often as high as 81% to 19%.

In the first caucus in Alaska on Feb 6, 1996, Buchanan overwhelmed Sen. Gramm 4 to 1, and Sen. Dole 2 to 1.

Louisiana, set up by Gramm people to try and insure an early Gramm victory, limited the voting sites to only 42 locations in the whole state! Voting machines were used so, strictly speaking, the accuracy of the published results could not be verified. But Buchanan sentiment was so obvious in the long lines waiting to vote at most of the 42 sites, that it would have been extremely risky for the establishment Republicans to publish results showing Gramm the victor. Buchanan won 2 to 1.

Next came the Iowa Caucuses, which like Alaska, saw neighbors voting and counting ballots on the spot. Even according to the Voter News Service partially falsified results, Buchanan came in a close 2nd, allegedly losing to Dole 26% to 23%. (See related story, Voter News Service Pg 2 Top)

In the New Hampshire Primary, 70% of the ballots were hand counted by neighbors at the precinct. A surprise ad by a group calling itself "Citizens for a Fair Vote Count" appeared the morning of the New Hampshire primary. The ad all but accused the 4 Big TV networks of helping rig US elections by publishing phony "projections" right as the polls close to prepare the voters for the phony computer results which would be announced later in the evening. Significantly, Citizens for a Fair Vote Count threatened to publish a comparison of the computer counted precincts against the hand counted precincts if Buchanan lost. Unlike 1992, when Buchanan's vote count unexplainably dropped steadily as the night progressed, while Bush's, quite suspiciously, remained constant, - in 1996 Buchanan won N.H.

But then came the computer counted states, starting with Delaware and Arizona. Forbes, we are told, "won" Delaware and Arizona. After that, Dole "won" all the rest of the computer counted states by truly incredible landslides.

But wait! Even after 25 or 26 computer "landslides" for Dole, Buchanan handily won the Missouri Caucus 34% to 27% (for Dole), which like Alaska, was a verifiable, unriggable caucus where neighbors met and counted the votes right on the spot.


ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, AP Have Covered Up the Role
of Shadowy 'Voter News Service' for Decades

Election Night "Competition" Between Big TV Networks A Hoax

by Ken Lowndes



The cover-up of the role of Voter News Service (VNS) in US elections by all four big TV networks has been broken to some degree. VNS was first brought to public attention by the Colliers, authors of Votescam: The Stealing of America.

Thanks to a spontaneous "radio rebellion" consisting of faxes, e-mails, and phone calls from concerned listeners across America, vote fraud investigator James J. Condit Jr. was invited onto over 30 talk shows reaching over 750 AM radio stations, as well as a worldwide audience through shortwave and satellite, after he and his associates proved that VNS had falsified results in Dubuque County in the Iowa GOP Presidential Primary.

The voters in that Iowa county had run an honest caucus and called in correct results - as verified by dozens of eye-witnesses. But that's when the 4 Big Networks' highly secretive exit polling arm, Voter News Service (VNS), got its swarmy hands into the process.


Here's How We Do It!

Blowing The Lid Off The Big Media Cover-up of Computer Vote Counting Methods
On the Way to Returning to Paper Ballots and Fair Elections

CNS Staff Report



If the station refuses to run the candidate's message, then he or she has the right to immediately file for, and receive, ownership of that station.

Through a willing candidate, Citizens can make their voices heard.

The current goal is to raise money for radio and, if possible, television commercials, which expose the Big Media decades-long cover-up of all the evidence which indicates that our country is being systematically stolen through computer votefraud.

A spotlight will be thrown on the cooperation of the 4 Big TV networks in staging the election night exit polling operation currently using the name Voter News Service (VNS).

A challenge will be issued for each Secretary of State in all 50 states to explain to the American people why they have all abdicated their election night responsibility to a handful of Establishment computer programming companies, the 4 Big TV networks, and VNS.

The first offensive is to be mounted in San Diego during the Republican National Convention, resources permitting.

After that, as resources allow, messages will be run throughout the country in heavy population centers in an attempt to force this issue into the public consciousness.

As soon as Citizens in each of the USA's 3075 counties demand easily read paper ballots, counted by neighbors in each precinct, and posted at the polling place before the ballots leave the precinct, the sooner freedom under God will be restored in our nation.


New World Order Hacks Will Win

"For the Rest of Your Life"

if Citizens Don't Begin Acting Like Americans

and Demand a Verifiable Hand Count of Paper Ballots


by Kenneth G. Gordon, Precinct Project Institute, Moscow, Idaho


Millions of American soldiers have fought and bled and died to protect your right, and the right of your children, to free and fair elections.

But every independent votefraud investigator who has written publicly on the subject believes that the overwhelming majority of US elections have now been made unverifiable, that is, riggable.

Computer expert Howard J. Strauss of Princeton University stated on national television in 1988: "When it comes to computerized elections, there are no safeguards. It's not a door without locks, it's a house without doors." (See Pg 2 Top Voter News Service story.)

And until Americans rise up and demand a hand count of easily read paper ballots by their neighbors in each local precinct, - thus making centrally rigged elections impossible - we will continue to get media chosen "leaders" such as Dole, Clinton, and Powell, who have not an ounce of grassroots support - but still manage to "win". These men are in reality low level opportunists -nothing more than glorified errand boys for the wirepullers of the New World Order Money Power.


Go to Page 2 & 3