The Permanent Revolution and The International Democratic Union

by Terry Hayfield

as carried by the Network America e-wire, with a short introduction by Jim Condit Jr.

October 20, 2003 NA (Network America) e-wire

This e-wire deals with a meeting in the White House that rank and file
Republicans are not supposed to know about – the very same meeting whose
mention agitated Ann Coulter and David Horowitz in the radio
confrontations covered in the first installment in this series.

It should be clarified that Mr. Hayfield is promoting Free Enterprise,
with tariffs and trade barriers which preserve national sovereignty, as
opposed to "Capitalism" -- which he recognizes as "Robber Baron
Capitalism", "Loan Shark Capitalism", or "Monopoly Capitalism" -- these
are my terms, not his -- but I thought it might be helpful to clarify
this.

Interestingly enough, in a 1931 encyclical, "Quadragesima Anno", Pope
Pius XI stated that unimpeded Capitalism allowed the most ruthless and
criminal elements to rise to the top of the society, which created the
conditions in which the people, out of desperation, are susceptible to
the siren song of socialism and communism.

Here is the 4th of four installments in this series from Terry Hayfield
on the actual workings and theory of the Ruling Elite’s Permanent
Revolution:

The Permanent Revolution and The International Democratic Union

by Terry Hayfield

What happened on June 10, 2002 in the White House?

If you did not respond: “the so-called ‘right of center’ conservative
Republican George W. Bush hosted a meeting of World Conservatives
promoting the concept of Liberal Democracy based on a national
sovereignty destroying Free Trade,” then you must read the following.

This is not a sound byte!

This is not a criticism!

It is a plea!

It is time for the American Alternative Press (that assures their
readers that they speak in defense of this Republic, its continued
independence and its Constitution) to finally discover and accept the
reality of the Permanent Revolution.

It is time to put aside the plethora of various conspiracy theories,
variety of revisionist histories and borrowed ideologies. Take off your
editorial blinders, you are missing one dandy of a revolution and the
biggest “scoop” of the Century.

This is about exposing the very real existence of the Permanent
Revolution.

If the existence of the Permanent Revolution is not included in your
perception of history or current events then any analysis of the present
is false!

For those that are not aware of the Permanent Revolution the simple
definition goes like this:

If Capitalism is left on its own unimpeded, it will naturally evolve
into a Socialism that will create the conditions for Communism. In
essence, Capitalism, Socialism and Communism all are integral parts of
the same process. The Permanent Revolution is the mother of all
political ideologies from abortion to Zionism.

In reality Communism has never existed! It is only now becoming a very
recent phenomenon!

The vast majority of “Right Wing” conservatives may howl “they know
Communism when they see it.” But they most definitely do not recognize
the very real threat presented to this country by the existence of the
International Democrat Union (IDU) and its prominent position
propagandizing for the little known Radical Capitalist Class Permanent
Revolution.

A more precise definition of the Permanent Revolution goes as follows:

The Permanent Revolution is a continuous process of War, Revolution and
Terror removing all impediments (the concept of national sovereignty
being the largest impediment) for the global proliferation of a
specific, unified American/British Capitalism that urgently needs an
international Free Market Place (Economic Democracy) based on
unrestricted Free Trade. The end result of this process is the need to
create a self-regulating classless society commonly referred to as The
Dictatorship of the Proletariat. This dictatorship is necessary to cure
The Flaw of Capitalism: overproduction and under-consumption. This
Capitalism repeatedly falls into economic crisis and when this
Capitalism is in deep crisis it must resort to some form of Fascism to
remain in control of the Permanent Revolution.


What does this have to do with a June 10, 2002 White House meeting (a
meeting completely missed by the American alternative patriotic press)?

To the best of my knowledge only one mainstream newspaper printed an
Associated Press story about the June 10, meeting. This paper was the
June 11 Toledo Blade. The article “Bush states case for 1st strike
against terrorists” appeared on page 4.

The Republican conservative, Right Wing, “elected” President of the
United States George W. Bush hosted a meeting of the IDU billed as a
gathering of World Conservatives. Apparently the Republican Party,
member of the IDU, has not explained the concept of world conservatism
to its membership. Call your respective State leader of the GOP and
inquire about Republican Party membership in the IDU then get “on line”
and type in any search engine www.idu.org

After you have done that “click on” the “Statement by the Press
Secretary” you will read the following:

“The IDU is an association of center and center-right political parties
from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas. The president looks
forward to discussing compassionate conservatism, the importance of free
markets, and efforts to advance democracy.”


“Well I never heard of the IDU,” you must be saying to yourself. I had
the same response when I read The Blade article. Now “click on” the
“About the IDU” icon.

“…Formed in 1983, the IDU provides a forum in which Parties holding
similar beliefs can come together and exchange views on matters of
policy and organisational interest, so they can learn from each other,
act together, establish contacts and speak with one strong voice to
promote democracy and center-right policies around the globe. Founder
members of the IDU include Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, then
Vice-president Bush Sr…”

“Countries can only develop their full potential if they develop
recognising the ideals of liberal democracy, freedom of the individual,
and the need for economic growth based on individual initiative and
free, competitive enterprise economies…

“Through the IDU, member Parties can exchange policy ideas, assist each
other to win the political argument, and to win elections…

“…A major event held every four years to coincide with the Republican
Convention, the last one held in July 2000 in Philadelphia, where George
W. Bush was selected as the Republican presidential candidate.”


If an individual is not fully aware of the Permanent Revolution it is
impossible to fully understand the serious implications of the above
quoted material concerning the IDU. A careful analysis (based on the
precepts of the Permanent Revolution) of the above will more than reveal
for all to see . . . the Permanent Revolution.

Let’s start with the Press Secretary’s remark: “The president looks
forward to discussing compassionate conservatism, the importance of free
markets, and efforts to advance democracy.”

The President of the United States takes an oath of office to uphold
the Constitution of the United States; nothing is mentioned in that oath
or the Constitution for the President to promote compassionate
conservatism, free trade or the advance of liberal democracy. At the
present time, the President, George W. Bush, is presented to the
American public as a conservative, right of center Republican. The term
conservative denotes an individual dedicated to preserving the spirit of
the founding fathers (authors of the Constitution) that created our
Republic, not liberal democracy.

The founding fathers intent of the creation of the Constitution was to
preserve the nation’s national sovereignty secured by the American
Revolution. Three of these founding fathers (Hamilton, Madison and
Jay) authored a series of essays to explain to the former British
colonials how the new Constitution was to function and just exactly what
was the function of the new Federal government. Central to this
argument was the necessity to raise funds for the new government to
provide adequate security for the continuation of our national
sovereignty. Protectionism was the choice of the founding fathers . . .
not Free Trade. This is explicitly explained in Hamilton’s “Essay #12”
of The Federalists Papers. This essay clearly states Free Trade (which
is the basis of the Free Market Economy) is not conducive to the
preservation of America’s valiantly won national sovereignty.

[The concept of national sovereignty is the largest single impediment to
the global proliferation of a specific American/British Capitalism. The
Permanent Revolution is a continuous process to remove the world’s
various national sovereignties.]

It is impossible to swear to protect this Republic’s national
sovereignty and at the same time support Free Trade! During this era
of the War on Terrorism President Bush can find the time to meet with
World Conservatives (correctly identified as neo-liberals) to discuss
Free Trade. Only a promoter of liberal World Democracy would support
such a concept. Surely an American Conservative, Right of Center
Republican President would oppose such an injurious concept. Wouldn’t
he?

Now let us move to the 1983 founding of the International Democratic
Union (IDU). Two of the founding members were “Prime Minister Margaret
Thatcher, and then Vice-president Bush Sr…”

Thatcher’s and Vice-president Bush’s administrations were dominated by
the political, economic and social concepts promoted by the British
Fabian Society. For those that do not know the very Socialist Fabian
Society created the New York Council of Foreign Relations, which gave
birth to the Trilateral Commission. Both Thatcher and Bush Sr. were
early members of the Trilateral Commission.

[The British Fabian Society was very influential in creating the
political groupings uniting American Capitalism and British Capitalism
to clear the impediments for the global proliferation of this specific
unified American/British Capitalism.]

The next issue to be covered is: “Countries can only develop their full
potential if they develop recognising the ideals of liberal democracy,
freedom of the individual, and the need for economic growth based on
individual initiative and free, competitive enterprise economies.”

For those that do not know the above quote is a VERY STRONG REFERRENCE
to the Socialist economic concepts put forth in Joseph A. Schumpeter’s
1942 book Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. In this monumental work,
Schumpeter takes the position that since man is a product of evolution
it stands to reason any institution developed by man will be
evolutionary in nature also. Capitalism is an institution of man.
Schumpeter therefore concluded Capitalism would naturally evolve into
Socialism. And Schumpeter recognized the political group that would
determine that future Socialism was the Fabian Society. It was
inevitable. The basis of Reaganomics was “Schumpeterism,” in the hands
of a group of 1930s Trotskyites of New York City College. They had
decided in the 1970s, collectivism would not work. These people became
known as Neo-Conservatives, more correctly identified as Neo-liberals
(see Peter Steinfels’ book published in 1979, “The Neo-conservatives,
The Men Who Are Changing America’s Politics”). These neo-cons, such as
Irving Kristol, gained access to the Reagan/Bush Sr. administration
through the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, the
Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute. The neo-cons
converted their Socialist slogans into the language of compassionate
conservatism.

[If Capitalism is left on its own unimpeded it will naturally evolve
into Socialism that will create Communism. In essence, Capitalism,
Socialism and Communism are all integral parts of the same process.]

The next issue to be tackled is: “Through the IDU, member Parties can
exchange policy ideas, assist each other to win the political argument,
and to win elections…”

This brings us directly to David Horowitz. Horowitz’s new book,
published in 2002, is “How to Beat the Democrats and Other Subversive
Ideas.” According to Horowitz and the Bush controlled “conservative”
Republican National Committee this book is the blueprint to get
Republicans elected to office in 2002 and 2004. To dedicated
Republicans Horowitz is “the man.”

The normal everyday run of the mill rank and file Republicans and
self-anointed conservatives do not know Horowitz is a 21st Century
“Neo-conservative” very similar to the Reagan era neo-cons. The jacket
liner for Horowitz’s 2000 book “The Art of political War and Other
Radical Pursuits” acknowledges:

“Once a notorious radical Himself, David Horowitz understands the mind
of the left better than any conservative.”

Referring to Horowitz as “a notorious radical” is similar to making a
vague statement that Michael Jordan was a ball player. There are a lot
of games played with a ball; baseball, football, soccer etc., just as
there are a large variety of left wing radicals; environmental, union
organizers, Socialists, Bolsheviks, Republicans etc. It is important to
know just what kind of ball is being played just as it is important to
know what kind of political radicalism a man practiced. Horowitz’s
forthcoming book and previous books have a list of books he has written.
There is one Horowitz book not mentioned, his 1969 epic, Empire and
Revolution. When one reads this book one can safely assume he was a
strong Bolshevik sympathizer and supporter. Horowitz and the Bolsheviks
understood the reality of the Permanent Revolution. A short quote from
page 7 of “Empire and Revolution” will illustrate:

“…The Bolsheviks proved themselves to be the only party able to assess
the developing situation correctly…

“More important, they proved themselves to be the only party which
possessed sufficient determination to express and enforce that will in
respect to the crucial questions…

“On the strength principally of their virtues, but also as a result of
their tactical brilliance, the Bolsheviks were swept into power in the
course of 1917, proclaiming that their triumph was but the beginning of
an era of world revolution . . .”

When one reads farther into “Empire and Revolution” it becomes quite
obvious why Horowitz has been hired by the Republican National Committee
to be one of their leading lights in determining election strategy.
Horowitz realized in 1969 what the vast majority of today’s Americans
are totally oblivious of, the reality of the Permanent Revolution. On
page 28, in a footnote at the bottom we read:

“Lenin referred to ‘uninterrupted’ or ‘continuous revolution’ rather
than ‘permanent revolution’ which had been revived as a term by Parvus
and Trotsky.”

On page 29, again in a footnote at the bottom of the page appears the
following:

“The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly revolutionizing the
instruments of production, and thereby the relations of society.”

Horowitz further clarifies his position in yet another footnote on page
30. He is being very specific. Please pay close attention to the
precise wording:

‘Capitalist production according to Marx and Engels had centralized
population and industry and concentrated property in a few hands. The
‘necessary consequence’ of this was political centralization.
Independent, or but loosely connected provinces, with separate
interests, laws, governments and systems of taxation, became lumped
together into one nation, with one government, one code of laws, one
national class-interest, one frontier and one customs-tariffs.”

[The Permanent Revolution is a continuous process removing impediments
to the proliferation of Capitalism based on Free Trade]

If you do not understand what kind of radical Horowitz was/is, one more
quote from Empire and Revolution (page 30) will more than suffice to
illustrate:

“For Capitalism establishes a world market which calls forth immense
developments in transportation and communications and these in turn
prompt the extension of industry, the further increase of capital and
demand. ‘The need of constantly expanding markets for its products
chases the bourgeoisie over the whole surface of the globe…’”

[When Capitalism quits expanding it falls into crisis. And when
Capitalism falls into crisis it resorts to some form of Fascism.]

Considering the above quotes from “Empire and Revolution” one must then
ask this question; “Has David Horowitz really changed?” A few quotes
from the advanced uncorrected reader’s proof edition of “How to Beat the
Democrats and Other Subversive Ideas” form pages 51-57 will provide the
obvious answer:

“Politics is war conducted by other means…

“…Politics is a permanent war. Every conflict is a contest for power,
every battle is about burying your enemy…

“…The political war is about matters of even greater moment. It’s about
good and evil; it’s about control of the future; it’s about changing the
world…

“…It’s about inventing a new America…

“…Politicians work hard to confuse voters and misrepresent their
opponents case…

“…Politics is a war of emotions…

“…Politics is a war of position…

“…Politics is about fear…”

[The Permanent Revolution is a continuous process of War, Revolution and
Terror]

The International Democrat Union member, The Republican Party (which
chooses not to openly acknowledge IDU membership) has chosen their
political election strategy planner very well. Horowitz definitely
understands the reality of the Permanent Revolution and the position of
the very specific and unified American/British Capitalism in this
revolution.

{“The president looks forward to discussing compassionate conservatism,
the importance of free markets, and efforts to advance democracy}

{“Countries can only develop their full potential if they develop
recognising the ideals of liberal democracy…and the need for economic
growth…”}

{“Through the IDU, member parties can exchange policy ideas, assist each
other to win the political argument and to win elections”}

President Bush is surrounded by members of the Council of Foreign
Relations (creation of the Fabian Society) and Neo-conservatives that
define Fabian policies. President Bush, along with a former chairman of
the Fabian Society, Prime Minister of England Tony Blair is waging a
World War on Terrorism, removing impediments for an American/British
Capitalism in severe economic crisis. And President Bush wants more
Republicans (a party that is a member of an organization pursuing
international liberal democracy) elected into office and to do this, men
such as David Horowitz (that understand the reality of the Permanent
Revolution) are specifically chosen to devise the winning election
strategy.

Ask yourself this question: “Are you for them or against them?”

And while you ponder your answer to the above question ask yourself:
“Gee, do I really want to support the evolution of Capitalism into a
Socialism that will lay the ground-work for Communism?”

It really doesn’t matter if the government knew in advance about the
tragedy of September 11, 2001; it doesn’t matter how the World Trade
Center was dropped; it doesn’t matter if a 767 flew or did not fly into
the Pentagon. What does matter is the Capitalism of Fabian Socialist
design is in severe economic crisis. What does matter is “the leaders
of the Free world” are pushing for a Free Market Economy (Economic
Liberal Democracy) based on international Free Trade (a Free Trade that
destroys the very vital concept of national sovereignty) as the basis of
our Freedoms.

Horowitz was correct: “politicians work hard to confuse the voters.”

[The Permanent Revolution is a continuous process of War, Revolution and
Terror to remove all impediments to the proliferation of a specific a
united American/British Capitalism. And when this Capitalism falls into
crisis it resorts to some sort of Fascism}

It is obvious, the answers to the above questions if you are a
patriotic American that believes in the existence of this Republic
should be… “NO!”

It is impossible to support Free Trade and swear an oath to protect and
support the Constitution of the United States of America.

The slogans of Patriotic, American conservatives should be: “Long live
this Republic,” and “Bring an end to the Permanent Revolution,” not “Are
you for us or against us?”
It is now time to realize the existence of the Permanent Revolution and
then expose the individuals and organizations that truly intend to
destroy the sovereignty of the American Republic!
End of the last of the 4 installments in this series on the “Permanent
Revolution” from Mr. Terry Hayfield. He can be contacted at:
catzman666@aol.com

End of this e-wire.


Jim Condit Jr.,
Director, Network America Ewire List
Director, Citizens for a Fair Vote Count

You can subscribe to the Network America ewire, which comes out a few times per month, at:

networkamerica-subscribe@topica.com  -- and you can read all the Network America e-wires since January 10, 2000 at: www.topica.com/lists/networkamerica/read