Home | Support Us | About Us | Introduction | News | Archive | Sales | Convention | Contact Us! | Subscribe | Links | |
"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything." Communist Tyrant Josef Stalin
July
18, 2000 NA (Network America) e-wire
What?
Buchanan Bias? What’s that?
In
the book we’ve been touting, “The Control Room” by CBS insider Martin
Plissner – Plissner inadvertently adds some evidence to our contention that
exit polls are just window dressing in the three pronged scam which includes
public opinion polls, exit polls, and computerized election results.
Could
public opinion polls be accurate? Yes, but they are not scientific and can also
be wrong. Can exit polls be correct? Yes, they can be correct, but they are in
no way scientific.
Can
Computer results be correct? Of course, but they are not verifiable, and
therefore we believe computer generated results as an act of faith, as elections
are now constituted in the USA.
We
at Network America believe that the Big TV Networks abuse the exit poll process
to use the whole charade as a means to prepare the public for the final
pre-determined results.
Here
is a quote from page 88 of Plissner’s “The Control Room.” In the below
passage, VRS is another name for Voter News Service, the exit polling arm of the
4 Big TV networks; Mitofsky is the sinister Warren Mitofsky, longtime mystery
man behind Voter News Service. Here’s the quote from page 88:
“By
early afternoon on the computer screens of the member networks, history seemed
to be in the making. In the New Hampshire Republican primary, George Bush led
Pat Buchanan by a puny 48 percent to 42 percent. (For some of us with long
memories, those numbers seemed spookily familiar. Six New Hampshire primaries
back, Lyndon Johnson had edged out Eugene McCarthy by 49 to 42 percent, and a
few weeks later Johnson abandoned his bid for re-election.) Those early
Bush-Buchanan numbers were never broadcast, but they circulated throughout the
day among the coterie of politicians and reporters with access to news unsafe
for public consumption. As it turned out, the public in this instance was well
served by the embargo. When the real votes came in, Bush had won not by a
piddling six but by a solid sixteen percentage points. This was the first
appearance of the “Buchanan Bias” in exit poll responses for which Mitofsky
in later primaries would try to make adjustments. (In polling usage, it should
be noted, the term ‘bias’ has nothing to do with the politics of the
pollster. Survey experts define ‘bias’ as error – unlike sampling error,
which can be plus or minus – that errs in only one direction. When you find
it, it’s not always easy to explain. Mitofsky’s best guess is that
Buchanan’s voters were prouder of what they had done and, hence, more prone to
respond, than Bush’s were.)”
Well,
well, well. Here we have a complete admission that exit polls by the Big TV
Networks are not scientific. When they find a Buchanan --- who exit polls higher
than his final vote, -- they have to suppress the exit polls as “not fit for
public consumption”, and then adjust their exit polls in the future based on
the “Buchanan bias.”
I
don’t know whether Plissner is a blissfully ignorant useful idiot who is
focused on the surface goings on of what he witnessed in his 35 years at CBS, or
if he is deliberately masking the realities here, but I have news for all of
them: Buchanan BIAS is known as PUBLIC SUPPORT when it happens for any other
candidate. In fact, there is no other candidate in the history of “exit
polling” that has generated a “bias”, according to these manipulators.
Furthermore,
the earliest returns were 49% to 49%, and someone who was in the Buchanan inner
circles when these results became known, heard Buchanan say, “ . . . we could
win this thing.” But that’s before the strange goings on began in which Bush
stayed at 49% and Buchanan dropped 3% every few hours until he was at 40% at 2
AM. THEN, the next morning, 10,000 ballots were “found” as reported by Larry
King the next night – and Buchanan dropped ANOTHER 3% to 37% -- just what Bush
was hoping for. In the meantime Bush allegedly rose to 53%.
Since
the Buchanan campaign made no provision to try and verify the vote – something
that could have been done in 70% of New Hampshire where votes were counted by
hand – one can be forgiven for suspecting that the Republican movers and
shakers used old fashioned methods to suppress Buchanan’s vote where computers
were not in place to do the job. 10,000 ballots “found” on Wednesday
morning? Strange.
As
older readers know, the exit pollers for Voter News Service,
-- which organization does the exit polling for all Big TV Networks, and
is jointly controlled by them, -- are mostly League of Women Voters members and
college students. They show up after rush hour in the morning, they quit to call
in their results before the evening rush hour begins. WE have video footage
showing the exit poller calling in her results on a pay phone from 5 PM to 7 PM,
while HUNDREDS of voters walk in and out of a high school where five precincts
were voting. AND, they admit only 1 out of 15 voters will even talk to them in
the off hours.
Back
to the exit polls that Plissner talks about above.
So
where’s the scientific basis of these exit polls? In the above passage
Plissner reveals that the exit pollers are totally dependent on which voters are
willing to talk to them, and that Buchanan supporters were more likely to want
to talk. In other words, the process is NOT scientific.
So
how do the TV Networks call the results almost 100% accurate as soon as the
polls close, or shortly thereafter, -- and
in the eighties, before they were exposed by the Colliers and our investigative
efforts – they called the many senatorial, gubernatorial, and presidential
election outcomes in the 49 computerized states --- to the exact percentage
point much of the time. HOW?
I
believe the Big TV Networks use exit polls – to snoop into what the public is
thinking in a hit or miss kind of way, same as public opinion polling. These
devices are used to auto-correct the courses of action being pursued by the
Ruling Elite – so they don’t overplay their hand. The results of these
polls, often different from what is announced to the public as demonstrated in
our e-wire archives, also determine what news events are emphasized in the weeks
ahead, according to Noam Chomsky, liberal professor at MIT. Chomsky gave a talk
to this effect on C-Span during the 1996 Presidential cycle.
But
evidence and logic strongly suggest that public opinion polls, exit polls, and
computerized vote counting are three prongs of a super-scam that results in
“Votescam: The Stealing of America” --- to invoke the title of the
Collier’s best selling book on the subject.
Jim Condit Jr.
Director, Citizens for a Fair Vote Count
Websites:
Citizens for a Fair Vote Count - Go to: http:www.votefraud.org
Network America - go to http://www.networkamerica.org
Read "Best of" Archives on this site or at http://www.lewisnews.com at "Citizens for a Fair Vote Count" section accessed in left hand column of home page.
To Subscribe to our daily Network America e-wire: networkamerica-subscribe@topica.com
To Unsubscribe to our daily Network America e-wire: networkamerica-unsubscribe@topica.com
RADIO SHOW ON LINE ALL THE TIME. Listen anytime to the 'Votefraud vs Honest Elections' crash course radio show over the internet at www.sightings.com in the archives, April 3rd, 2000 show, Jeff Rense host, Jim Condit Jr. guest. If the transmission breaks, reconnect to sightings.com and manually move the bar to the place in the show where the audio transmission broke
To write us with information or order by educational tapes and materials by mail, write us at Citizens for a Fair Vote Count, PO Box 11339, Cincinnati, Ohio 45211
To contact us, e-mail to: jconditjr@votefraud.org or jconditjr@networkamerica.org
Please forward our messages to friends and opinion molders, and tell them about our websites and daily e-wire communications. This information, especially in election season, offers an opportunity to de-stablize the New World Order Ruling Elite and restore honest elections with citizens checks and balances, true Freedom under God, and true Free Enterprise in America.
Let fellow citizens, opinion molders, pastors, public officials, internet news outlets, and major news media outlets know -- that we will not believe the published results of elections until transparent, verifiable, honest vote counting methods are restored, i.e., paper ballots with citizen checks and balances, with the ballot counting under the control of the neighborhood registered voters in each precinct.
Receive free e-mail announcements on vital Election 2000, VoteFraud News and Big TV Manipulation of the American Mind. Enter your e-mail address below, then click "Join"! |
Home | Support Us | About Us | Introduction | News | Archive | Sales | Convention | Contact Us! | Subscribe | Links | |